Edward W Sweeney 22nd Judicial Circuit (St. Louis City)

Recommendations

The 22nd Circuit Judicial Performance Evaluation Committee recommends that Judge Edward W. Sweeney BE RETAINED.

Position

Circuit Judge

Evaluation Year

2012

Background

Judge Edward W. Sweeney was appointed an associate circuit judge for the 22nd Judicial Circuit in December 1997 and retained by the voters in 1998 and 2002. He was appointed a circuit judge in January 2005 and retained by the voters in 2006. He received a bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of Missouri-Columbia with a Bachelor of Arts degree and his law degree from the University of Missouri-Columbia with credits from the University of Notre Dame. He also received a master’s degree in business administration from St. Louis University. He served as a Missouri state legislator from 1975-1980 and in the U.S. Army in Vietnam.

He served as a special judge to the Supreme Court of Missouri in September 2011. He was the criminal assignment division judge in 2006, equity division in 2007 and 2008, equity and civil motions division in 2009, and general trial division (civil and criminal) in 2010, 2011 and 2012. He has received certificates from the National Judicial College for Trial Judge Skills and Dispute Resolution Skills after completion of classroom lectures and group discussions. He has also been selected by the Supreme Court of Missouri to participate in the ASTAR (Advanced Science and Technology Adjudication Resource) Center trial judge training program. The ASTAR center is dedicated to education of judges in matters of complex science and technology.

He is a member of Saint Joan of Arc Parish, and assists with the Ed Sweeney, Sr. Scholarship Fund.

Discussion

Attorneys who responded to survey questions rated Judge Sweeney on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 representing “not at all” and 5 representing “completely.” He received his highest scores for: treating people equally regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, economic status or any other factor (4.55); maintaining and requiring proper order and decorum in the courtroom (4.49); and allowing parties latitude to present their arguments (4.42). Judge Sweeney’s lower scores were for issuing timely opinions or decisions (3.60) and efficiently managing his docket (3.69).

The committee also reviewed surveys submitted by Judge Sweeney’s peers on the bench. He received his highest scores of 4.50 for: treating people equally regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, economic status or any other factor; displaying fairness and impartiality toward each side of the case; allowing parties latitude to present their arguments; basing his decisions on evidence and arguments; and writing opinions and orders clearly. His lower scores wre for efficiently managing his docket (4.13) and maintain and requiring proper decorum in the courtroom (4.14).

The committee also reviewed survey responses submitted by jurors who were seated in jury trials before Judge Sweeney. Judge Sweeney received an almost unanimously favorable response from the jurors on question relating to 10 separate criteria regarding his conduct throughout the jury trials.

The committee has also reviewed a written opinion submitted by Judge Sweeney that dealt with a request for certification of a class action and found that the opinion was well reasoned, clearly written, and faithful to the case precedents on class certification.

Survey Results
Lawyer Survey Results
Peer Survey Results
Juror Survey Results
If printing surveys, you may need to select “Fit to Printable Area” or “Landscape.”
Opinion 1
Opinion 2
Opinion 3